Problem
Developers spend significant time on documentation:
- Need to write READMEs and guides from terminal work
- Manual step-by-step documentation after screen recording
- Copy-pasting command history one by one
- Writing CHANGELOG and tutorials is repetitive and tedious
Pain Intensity: 7/10 - Repetitive and time-consuming task
Market
- Primary Market: Developers who write technical documentation
- Segment: DevRel, open-source maintainers, tech leads
- TAM: Documentation tools market ~$2B in 2026 (Loom, Scribe, Tango)
- SAM: Developer-specific documentation ~$200M
Solution
AI Doc Writer CLI - A CLI tool that automatically documents terminal sessions
Core Features
- Session Recording: Start recording with
docw start - AI Analysis: Understand command sequence, output, and intent
- Doc Generation: Auto-generate README, tutorials, CHANGELOG
- Format Support: Markdown, AsciiDoc, HTML output
Usage Example
# Start session
$ docw start "Docker deployment guide"
# Do regular work
$ docker build -t myapp .
$ docker run -p 3000:3000 myapp
# Stop session and generate docs
$ docw stop --format markdown --output DEPLOY.md
Generated Output
# Docker Deployment Guide
## 1. Build Image
Build the image using the Dockerfile in the current directory.
\`\`\`bash
docker build -t myapp .
\`\`\`
## 2. Run Container
Run the container with port 3000 exposed.
\`\`\`bash
docker run -p 3000:3000 myapp
\`\`\`
Competition
| Competitor | Price | Weakness |
|---|---|---|
| Trupeer AI Doc Writer | $20+/mo | Requires screen recording, GUI-centric |
| Scribe | $20/user/mo | Browser-based, no CLI support |
| asciinema | Free | Playback only, no doc conversion |
| script command | Free | Raw output, no AI analysis |
Competition Intensity: Medium - No terminal-specific tool exists Differentiation: CLI-native, developer workflow integration
MVP Development
- MVP Timeline: 10 weeks
- Full Version: 6 months
- Tech Complexity: Medium
- Stack: Rust/Go (CLI), LLM API, Markdown parser
MVP Scope
- Terminal session recording (PTY capture)
- Document generation via GPT-4o/Claude API
- Markdown output
- Basic templates (README, Tutorial)
Revenue Model
- Model: Freemium + Usage-based
- Pricing:
- Free: 5 sessions/month, basic templates
- Pro: $12/mo (unlimited sessions, custom templates)
- Team: $25/user/mo (team sharing, branding)
- Expected MRR (6 months): $2,000-5,000
- Expected MRR (12 months): $8,000-15,000
Risk
| Type | Level | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Technical | Medium | PTY capture cross-platform issues |
| Market | Medium | Need to change developer doc habits |
| Execution | Medium | LLM cost management required |
Recommendation
Score: 92/100 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Why Recommended
- Trupeer validated screen recording → docs market
- CLI specialization targets developer niche
- LLM costs dropping improves margins
- Clear target: open-source maintainers
Risk Factors
- PTY capture cross-platform complexity
- Accuracy for complex session analysis
First Actions
- Build PTY session capture PoC in Go
- Test doc generation with Claude API
- Use it first on your own project READMEs
This idea transplants Trupeer AI Doc Writer’s screen recording → documentation concept into the terminal CLI environment.